Frankensteinversus his Creature in Mary Shelley`s Novel
Thenovel Frankenstein, which is written by the author Mary Shelley, isall about a certain creature that gives a statement that thecreature’s only needs are for a female companion. The novel waswritten by the female author while she was having a vacation with herlover who was Percy Shelley to the Switzerland where they meet someof their friends. During that period, their summer never went so wellin that there was a bad weather that was filled with gray and rainyperiods. In their stay, one of their friends, a poet, Lord Byron,comes up with an idea that everyone should come up with a story thatis ghost related which he intended the activity to keep them busy allthrough the dull summer period. The only idea by the poet made MarryShelley write the most epic stories in the world. The picture ofFrankenstein’s monster has made all thing bigger than the novelitself. Back to the story itself, Mary Shelley gives out a story of adoctor he gave the name Victor Frankenstein, who was an ambitious manwho had an amazing character of creating life using lifeless matter.It contained three characters that were a Captain Robert Walton, theDoctor Victor Frankenstein, and the monster. Captain Walton’sletter to his sister gave a hint that he was on a mission on theexploration of the North Pole. On the exploration mission, they spota poor man on a small raft together with his shipmates. The poor manwas brought on board and gives an introduction that he was called bythe name Victor Frankenstein who was at that time very weak and poorin health. Frankenstein became friends with Captain Walton and hisfriends where he starts to tell the story of his life.
Thestory brings up different aspects where it had an awakeningfascination. The most touching part was the instance where there wasthe story of Frankenstein and the monster. Their relationship to eachother was amazing. The novel tries to bring up all about good versusevil deeds that make up the large part of the novel’s theme atlarge. It gives a showing that the good and the evil are not easy tobe determined in a daily life.
Ata general look at the personalities presented in the novel, Victor,and the creature that is a result of his creation look like they havevery minute characteristics in common. In their physical terms, thetwo are poles distant, with his creature that is described more likea monster being quite tall and also very strong. The monster is of adreadful physical look that keeps away those that are around him,which makes it difficult for him to institute relationships. On theother hand, Victor is an ordinary man while regarding his physique,and thus is much weaker compared to the monster.
However,when we look closely at the two characters that come into play, thereappears that there is somewhat a number of similarities that arepresentable to compare Victor and his creature of creation themonster. The two characters are anchorites, which presents the factthey are either snubbing or are being snubbed by civilization. ,Victor made a choice to detach himself from all his fellow men,leaving his dad, Elizabeth, as well as his family by themselvesintentionally to follow his methodical exploration. It is obviouslyindicated that the monster does not make a choice of spurning anyman, but he is being shunned by them mostly due to his patheticappearance. While both experience estrangement and segregation, thereasons behind these actions are different for each character.
Inaddition, both characters show themselves to be philosophicallythinking, and they appear as rational and intellectual individuals.Frankenstein’s scientific acquaintance describes those above, butdistinctively for the monster too, it presents itself as anexceedingly brainy and thoughtful establishment. While observing DeLaceys household, the monster shows his intellectualness by making anobservation:
“Ican hardly describe to you the effect of these books. They producedin me an infinity of new images and feelings that sometimes raised meto ecstasy but more frequently sunk me into the lowest dejection.”(Shelly 163)
Inthe way through which the monster catches literary equivalentsbetween his condition and that of the character Satan in Milton`sReading: Paradise Lost, is an excellent example. This observationshowed his capability to reflect and reason creatively the kind ofqualities that Frankenstein has already revealed during the period hegained the knowledge essential to create life.
InMary Shelley`s novel Frankenstein, Victor and his monster share threenoteworthy qualities: they both need familial connections, theyportray their love of nature, and they have a desire for revengeagainst their rivals.
Frankensteinand his established creature, the monster, both portray a yearningfor family bonds. Victor desires to wed his darling Elizabeth and inthe same breath the monster aspires to find friendship in the DeLacey household. The two characters shows a robust relationship withflora and fauna: the Mother Nature.in their lifetime, anytime theyfeel dejected they look for a way to find consolation in nature.Frankenstein and the monster also present their passionate vengeanceand reprisal, which is largely epitomized over the finishing chaptersof Shelly’s novel. Notwithstanding their significantly dissimilarappearances and lives, Frankenstein, and his created monster depictmany similarities.
DoctorFrankenstein and the monster have several characters that arediffering in a large perception. They both have characters thatportray that they are different in a certain way. Victor Frankensteingives an overall appearance that he was a kind and good human being.He has that love towards his family and friends and his eloquence andan educated mind. This loving character is portrait in the act thathe even creates the monster.
Victoris a selfless person. His self-centered tendency is portrait wherethe monster tells him “I shall be with you on your wedding night”(Shelley 163). After this threat, he decides to destroy the femalethat the monster had urged Victor to create. He wants to do thingsso that he is known as an outstanding person and be in historicalrecords. This trait is portrait in the act that he goes on in thecreating the monster without taking into mind the consequences thathe was bringing to the society mostly his family. He wanted to beknown as a man who created something big and a hero of his own. Victor Frankenstein is sarcastic in his actions, he goes ahead in thedeclaration that he loves his family and that his life would benothing without them whereas his actions and deeds do not give adisplay of the love he has for the family.
Victoris egotistic, the egotistic behavior is portrait in the act thatVictor gives a concentration in the creation of life. He leavesbehind his family to go to a far university in Germany in a pursuitto study science. At a fast time, he had a good correspondence withhis family but after the development of the interest in the creationof life, he starts to ignore them. This act is also clearly shownwhere his mother had died a few weeks before he went to theUniversity. He goes ahead to departing where it was the best time toshow his family the love and affection. The monster had a characterthat was evil. In an instance, the monster commits a heinous crime.
Themonster’s life is filled with anger and bitterness. He killedvictor’s brother William and went ahead to frame the servant girlfor the murder. Again he murders victor’s best friend Henry Clervaland even the worst murdering victor’s lover Elizabeth. This actportrays the monster’s trait as aggressive in a negative way. Onthe other hand, the monster portraits a character of a helpful trait.He goes ahead in the making the family daily living. He even goesahead in the collection of firewood to the family. He shows a lovingcharacter where we are told at some point, and he had to love thefamily. The monster had a judging character. Several events that hadhappened made him learn a lesson the he had no point of being a goodthing (Shelley 140-141).
Shelley,Mary Wollstonecraft, and David Stevens. Frankenstein,Or, The Modern Prometheus.Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1998. Print.