Should Minors Face Similar Law with Adults?

ShouldMinors Face Similar Law with Adults?

Nameof student

Namof professor

ShouldMinors Face Similar Law with Adults?

Thequestionon whetherto subjectminorsto thesametreatmentas adultswhenever theycommita crimeis verycontroversial.Agoodnumberof peoplefeelthattheyshould facethesameharshpenaltiessince thegravityof thecrimestheycommitis not differentfrom thatresultingfrom adultcrimes.On theotherhand,youthcampaigners havea staunchstandin supportfortheexemptionof minorson trialsinvolvingthefullapplicationof thelawas thegovernmentdoeson peopleover theageof eighteen years.

Researchshowsdisparitiesin mentalandcognitive abilitiesof theminorsandtheadults.Their biologicalandcognitive developmentis stillin theprocessof maturity.Therevelationis enoughevidenceto warrantthem a lesserpunishmentthattheir adultfriendsin crimeespeciallyforlessseriousallegations.Therefore,thedueprocessshould loosenthegripon their delinquencydue to theyouths’inabilityto cope with thetryingconditionsof adultprisons.However,thesocietyshould not overlookgraveincidentssince theymay be a gateway to a communitythat will habitually commencethehuntingof individualsafter theyattainmaturityfortheir non-trimmed behaviors(Steinberg, 2009).

Dueto theunderdevelopedpsychologicalabilityof theminors,theyare likelyto experiencemoretraumaswhenin jailmorethan theadultprisoners.Somepeoplearguethatsubjectingthem to thefullapplicationof thelawviolatestheir developmental rights.However,itis worthunderstandingthatnot allminorsactlike youngpeople.Someof their behaviorswarranttheapplicationof theentiredueprocess.Forexamplein thecaseof coldbloodmurder,itwould servetherightpurposeto puttheminorin jailratherthan in thejuvenileprisonwhenlightoffenders congregate.However,thisshould finda placein thejuvenilecourtswherebya comprehensivecorrectional procedurebecomesinstituted(Steinberg, 2009).

Theotherreasonas to whyjuvenileoffenders should not facea similarwrathwith theadultsis thattheadultprisonscenterslacka comprehensivecorrectional systemto streamline outlier minors.Whenhardcore youngpeoplemixwith lightoffenders, thegravityof their casebecomesneutralized.Whentheyemergefrom thecenters,theyare likelyto reoffend. However,iftheyspendtherequiredtimein a juvenilecorrectional center,theywill rethink before committinganothercrime(Steinberg, 2009).

Thesupportersof theideabelievethatwhenyoungpeoplecommita crime,theydosoas adultsbecausetheyhavethefullknowledgeof therepercussionslikelyto follow.Givingthem a lesserpunishmentonlyperpetuatescrimein thesociety.Seriouscrimesneeda parole-free prosecution.Tougherrulesare likelyto curtailthelevel of crimein thesociety(Stimson &amp Grossman, 2009).

Inconclusion,juvenilecentersshould be setwith a comprehensivecorrectional systemthat streamlines thebehaviorof theminors.Thenumberof crimescommittedin anyregionreflectsthetoughness of thecriminallawappliedto offenders. Theapplicationof thelawdoesnot necessarilysuggestthatitcan onlyhappenin an adultprison.Whenpeoplebecomelaw-abiding whentheyare stillyoung,there is a highpossibilityof holdingonto thebehaviorevenduring adulthood. Therefore,age-respective correctional servicesageshould supportjusticeandthesocietal wellbeingwhenitto discipliningdangerouscriminals.

References

Steinberg,L. (2009). Adolescent Development and Juvenile Justice. AnnualReview of Clinical Psychology,5,459-485.

Stimson,C. D., &amp Grossman, A. M. (2009). AdultTime for Adult Crimes: Life Without Parole for Juvenile Killers andViolent Teens.Heritage Foundation: Washington.