The linkage Between Formal and Informal Economy Abstract

4

Thelinkage Between Formal and Informal Economy

Abstract

Thesection gives brief background information concerning the study, thatis, the formal and informal economies. It lays emphasis on the paperdetails. From the inception of the idea of informal sector in theearly 1970s, there have been lots of discussions and debatesconcerning informal economy within the international developmentsector. Though there are a number of debates that have been raisedconcerning the idea of informal economy, most of the policymakers,activists and researchers agree that informal economy is integral inrealizing growth in the economy. The importance of the informaleconomy cannot be underestimated given the large portion of differenteconomic units and workers that are not within the regulated worldand protected employments. Currently, there is increased interest inthe informal economy globally. The interests are mainly arising fromtwo areas. First, the informal economy continues to grow and at thesame time progressively emerge in different forms and in differentunpredicted places. Second, even though conversations supporting andagainst have toned the features and characteristics of informaleconomy, supporting the informal sector as well as the enterprisesand improving the informal jobs are integral in growth promotion andpoverty reduction.

Thispaper seeks to find the linkage between the formal and informaleconomies and regulatory environment that defines this relationshipin the financial sector (Goldsmith, 1955). The paper begins bydescribing the idea of informal economy and does this by defining itssize, composition as well as segmentation. The paper in itsconclusion agrees that there is need to have or establish a linkagebetween the formal and informal economy. The facilitation of thelinkage needs to be done using proper policy formulations andregulatory environment (Oresotu, 1996).

Itis widely known that both the formal and informal sector contributesenormously to the financial progress owing to the bigger role thatthey play in offering funds to both the small and micro enterprises(Goldsmith, 1955). Even though, the extent of the contributions ofinformal economy has not been easily quantified given the issues thatarise from measuring the performances, one can never doubt the factthat their contributions are immense to the GDP of any country. Inmost of the countries, especially the developing countries likeNigeria globally, most of the economic activities take place outsidethe scope of government regulations. Usually, the activities are notrecorded or at times they are mis-recorded or even omitted by theauthorities in charge of the regulations. Currently, the societyaccounts for nearly 30-90% of its craftsmen and market women andapproximately 50% of the workers in industrial sector based in urbanareas using the informal financial markets(Letvisky,2000).

Thefirst report to appreciate the significant role of the informalsector in the development and growth of an economy was the 1973report of International Labor Organization (ILO) employment missionto Kenya. Before this time there was little or no consideration thatwas given to the informal sector. The sector is mainly responsiblefor around 50% of the operations that occur in a number of thedeveloping countries. This is owing to the fact that they operate inthe form of micro enterprises and these include artisans, householdbusinesses, the cottage industries and self-employed individuals.

Theinformal sector alludes to all the economic activities in the varioussectors of the economy that operate not within the regulations of thegovernment. Usually, this sector is characterized as being irregular,runs parallel, not properly structured, and invisible, operates insome underground form, unobserved and above all is known to beresidual. Usually, the informal economic activities in a number ofcountries include a large number of small-scale and largelyself-employed activities. Mostly, the financial and economicactivities are subsistence and they include retail trading, localtransport, management of restaurant, various financialintermediations, repair services and both household and personalservices (Goldsmith, 1955). Often, these activities in the informalsector pose a big challenge in terms of measurability as they areknown to be highly dynamic and contribute significantly to the growthof the economy as well as add to the personal and household incomesof individuals.

Usually,the lack of will of the formal financial sector to give financialservices to the urban and rural poor, coupled with theunsustainability of government supported advancement financial plansadded to the development of informal financial sector in many nations(Lalesh, 2004). Informal financial organizations in most developingnations came and took root before the modern banking sector. Often,they are found to occur in form of traditional groups that worktogether to achieve the mutual benefits among its members. Thesegroups give investment funds and credit services to theirindividuals, working under distinctive names in diverse parts of thenation. For instance, it is known as &quotesusu&quot among theYorubas of Western Nigeria, &quotetoto&quot for the lgbos in theEast and &quotadashi&quot in the North for the Hausas (CBN, 2000).The key highlights of these informal plans are in reserve funds andcredit intermediation. Their operations are generally informal andthey charge higher premium rates contrast with the formal savingmoney sector.

Thedemand of the various financial services in the developing countriesis seen to be on the increasing trend and such an increase is mainlywitnessed in the informal sector of the economy.

Thepersistent and regular lay-off of workers from both the public andprivate sectors since the introduction of the structural adjustmentprogram in the 80s in the developing nations and the increased numberof school leaver without promptly accessible vocation is pushing anexpansive extent of the populace into informal sector exercises.Numerous small scale endeavors are, in this manner, springing uphowever without bank financial backing. Likewise the local businesssector is extensive, with a decent partition of the people needingdifferent products and administrations, including financialadministrations (Anyanwu, 2004).

Itis within the public domain and general knowledge in Nigeria that theformal financial framework gives services to approximately 35 percentof the economically dynamic populace, while the remaining 65 percentare prohibited from access to formal financial services (CBN, 2005).This is credited to the way that the country is described by lowsaving money populace thickness of 1: 30,432 preceding the bankcombining in 2005, Soludo (2007). Normally, most of the dynamicpopulace in many nations access financial administrations throughinformal course of action which are generally extremely exploitative.

TheFormal Regulatory Environment

Therelationship between the formal and informal economy is often viewedin different ways. First, there is view that is given in regard tothe enterprises where the dualists are known to concentrate less onthe regulations of the government of the day and interestingly putmore focus on the ability of government to provide the necessarysupport services like the credit facilities and business developmentservices. The second dimension is the informal wage workers. Inregards to this group, there is the application of the neo-classicaleconomics concept. The concept under application in this case is thatany intervention by the government in labor markets leads to rigidityin wages which even encourages informal employment.

Onthe other hand, there is a belief held by the legalists who opinethat an increase in economic freedom and entrepreneurial activitiesamong the working class occurs as a result of governmentderegulation. This trend is mainly observed in the developingcountries. The other main regulation is the formalization of propertyrights for the informal workers. The conversion assists them toconvert the assets held in informal way to become real assets (deSoto, 2000). On the other hand, there is connection of the twoeconomies in terms of the relationship in regulations of differentbusiness sizes. The link is seen when the governments regulates theunequal link that exist between big businesses and the subordinatedproducers in the informal economy and workers. For the informalproducers, there is regulation of commercial relations while on theother hand there is regulation of employment relations for theinformal wage workers.

TheInformal Economy

Inthis section, the concept of the informal economy is fully defined.The summary of the new and expanded meaning of the informal economyis given. Additionally, this section gives the segmented structureand the assumptions underlying this economy. Summary of men and womenin this economy is detailed. The late re-union of enthusiasm in theinformal economy has been joined by huge reexamining of the idea, inany event in a few circles. The reevaluating about the informaleconomy, outlined beneath, incorporates another term and extendeddefinition acknowledgment of its sectioned structure and a changedarrangement of suspicions about its defining highlights. This areacloses with an outline of accessible insights on ladies and men inthe informal economy extensively defined.

NewTerm and Expanded Definition

Lately,a group of educated activists and specialists, including individualsfrom the worldwide exploration policy system Women in InformalEmployment: Globalizing and Organizing (WIEGO), have worked with theInternational Labor Organization (ILO) to increase the prior idea anddefinition of the `informal sector` to join certain sorts of informaljob that were excluded in the before idea and definition (countingthe authority universal measurable definition). They look toincorporate the entire of informality, as it is showed inindustrialized, move and developing economies and this presentreality flow in labor showcases today, especially the work courses ofaction of the working poor.

Theseonlookers need to extend the center to incorporate endeavors that arenot legitimately directed as well as occupation connections that arenot lawfully managed or secured. In short, the new definition of the`informal economy` concentrates on the way of work notwithstandingthe qualities of undertakings. It likewise incorporates informal workboth inside and outside agribusiness.

Literatureon Informal Financial Sector

Thetheoretical investigation of financial markets in developing nationshas been changed through the use of the theory of economic conductunder states of deficient markets and blemished data. Countlesspapers have investigated the ramifications of flawed data andfragmented markets for contractual structures in credit showcases inlow-salary rural settings. These theories is specifically significantto informal financial exchanges in Africa however the degree to whichthese theories can give understanding into informal finance in Africais not yet decided, then again, the theories have the capability ofenlightening the striking highlights of numerous informal financialmarkets in Africa( Arteerey, 1995).

Thespearheading work of Stiglitz and Weiss (1981) imprints the start ofendeavors in clarifying credit apportioning in credit markets. Asindicated by them, intrigue rates charged by an acknowledgefoundation are seen as assuming double part of sorting potentialborrowers (prompting unfriendly choice), and influencing theactivities of borrowers (prompting the motivator impact). Bothimpacts are seen as a consequence of the flawed data intrinsic incredit markets. Antagonistic choice happens in light of the fact thatloan specialists might want to distinguish the borrowers well on theway to reimburse their credits following the banks` normal returnsrely on upon the likelihood of reimbursement (Tim berg and Ailyar,1984).

Whiletrying to distinguish borrowers with high likelihood of repayment,banks are liable to utilize the premium rates that an individual iswilling to pay as a screening gadget. Nonetheless, borrowers willingto pay high premium rates might by and large be more awful dangersaccordingly as the premium rate expands, the peril of the individualswho borrow likewise builds, decreasing the bank`s benefit. Themotivation impact happens in light of the fact that as the interestrate and different terms of the agreement change, the conduct ofborrowers is liable to change since it influences the returns ontheir ventures.

Breakingdown the reason for mediations in rural credit showcases in thevicinity of business sector disappointment, Besley (1994) remarkedthat since credit markets are portrayed by defective data and highexpenses of agreement requirement, a productivity measure as existsin a consummately focused business will not be an exact measureagainst which to define market disappointment. The issue that existsin flawed business circumstance prompts credit apportioning,unfriendly determination and good risk in the credit markets (Timberg and Ailyar, 1984). Antagonistic determination emerges in lightof the fact that without flawless data about the borrower, anincrement in interest rates empowers borrowers with the mostdangerous activities, and subsequently to the least extent liable torepay, to borrow, while those with the minimum hazardous undertakingsstop to borrow. Interest rates will hence assume the allocative partof demand and supply for loanable funds, and will likewise influencethe normal nature of loan specialists` advance portfolios.

Moneylenderswill alter the interest rates at a lower level and apportion accessto credit. Blemished data is subsequently essential in clarifying thepresence of credit apportioning in rural credit markets. Good riskhappens fundamentally in light of the fact that tasks haveindistinguishable mean returns yet diverse degrees of danger, andmoneylenders are not able to recognize the borrowers` activities(Stiglitz and Weiss, 1981 Besley, 1994). Besley (1994) state furthersignificant highlights of rural credit advertises that can beutilized to clarify the presence of formal and informal creditshowcases in Africa .

Amongthese are the presence of security and covariant danger. Insurancesecurity is regularly past the scope of numerous borrowers in ruralregions. In any case, even where this is not the situation, thecapacity of the loan specialist to abandon is regularly constrained,making implementation of credit repayment troublesome. Such troubleshelp to clarify the utilization of informal financial markets, whichutilize social approvals to guarantee authorization. In rural zones,stuns in livelihoods that make borrowers` capability to default willinfluence the operation of credit markets. In most rural economies,borrowers are confronted with dangers emerging from vulnerabilitiesabout their salaries. By broadening their advance portfolios, loanspecialists can deflect such dangers. In any case, credit showcasesin rural ranges are portioned, with moneylenders` advance portfoliosbeing concentrated on borrowers confronting regular stuns to theirwages.

TheLinkages between the Formal and the Informal Economy- FinancialSector

Thelinkages between the formal and the informal financial sector couldbe portrayed as being complimentary and not aggressive where theyexist (Ojo 1996). Most journalists accept that positive relationshipexit between the formal and the informal financial sectors. Learningof the level of communication between the two sectors will givevaluable manual for comprehension the viability of developmentarrangements for enhancing the exhibitions of both sectors. Withoutsuch data, it is truly conceivable that an approach focused atenhancing the execution of the formal financial sector may promptastounding and frustrating development.

Theignorance and omission of the activities of the informal financialsector in the official measurements calls for genuine concern on thegrounds that the level of economic development in most developingcountries relies on upon the span of its informal sector. In numerousdeveloping nations particularly in Africa the informal sector isbigger than the formal sector that produces the information thatframed the premise of macroeconomic arrangements. Economic policydepends on information assembled from the exercises of the formalsector may not be proper and might, indeed, be unfavorable to thewider informal sector.

Oresotu(1996) inferred that there is a solid connection betweenmacroeconomic policy environment and the informal sector. Theconnection is given by the exercises of the informal financialoperators that depend on advances taken from the formal financialmiddle people to relend to borrowers in the informal financialbusiness sector. The informal financial specialists rendersignificant financial administrations by financing creation exercisesthrough the expansion of advances to small scale undertaking andlaborer ranchers who usually are not considered in the plan by formalsector due to their powerlessness to give suitable security. Soyibo(1996) opine that the informal sector demonstrates the disappointmentof the cutting edge market economy to give employments andoccupations to substantial segments of the populace. It comprise ofthe people and gatherings let alone for the development of thecurrent economy, with an end goal to survive, develop entrepreneurialactivities in customary structures however on a little scale and itcontinues developing a consistent schedule as individuals misfortunetheir occupation in the formal sector (Osi- Afiana, 2004).

Developmentof the formal sector had been drowsy in numerous developing economieswhile the administration needs to adapt to a double economy so as toencourage economy development. The formal financial framework in mostdeveloping nations is insufficient to meet the aggregate needs of oneand all in their quest for economic activities. Due to this, economicdevelopment is stagnated, the main part of the rural populace and theurban poor, specifically, and in some cases the lower working classhas no entrance to banks or other authority credit foundations sothey turn to getting their financial needs met in the informal sector(Lalesh, 2004).

Ahefty portion of the informal financial intermediaries that work asself-help organizations attempted to build linkages with the formalorganizations in their neighborhood settings to help little businessperson to have admittance to bank credit (Tim berg and Ailyar, 1984).The banks may not be huge business banks but rather a non-keepingmoney formal funds and credit agreeable that transform from self-helpassociations (Damachi, 1982). It is the formal reserve funds andcredit organizations that thus set up linkages with development bankson the grounds that they are enlisted and perceived than individualrotational investment funds and advance groups. Banks regularly findit hard to arrangement straightforwardly with gatherings that do nothave lawful status. This is on the grounds that banks dependintensely on lawful contracts to capacity. Informal groups withoutlawful status are by and large not permitted to open sparing recordsand cannot acquire gathering credits. That is the reason attempts aremade to transmute self-help associations to formal groups to issuethem legitimate status so they can connect directly with the banks.

Chipetaand Mkandawire (1992) affirmed the presence of connections betweenthe Informal Financial Sector and the Formal Financial Sector.Moneylenders, indigenous financiers and agreeable funds society areknown to be saving surplus trusts with Formal Financial Institutions(Bouman, 1995),. Likewise, clients of formal financial foundationshave lines of credit with informal financial establishments. Theseconnections make the channel through which credit control and fiscalpolicies focused at the formal financial sector influence the volumeof assets and credit in the informal financial sector andsubsequently the general adequacy of financial policies. Bothbackhanded and direct credit and store connections exist. Theaberrant credit and store linkages are critical. The immediate creditconnections are inconsequential, yet the immediate store joins withmoneylenders are huge (Alieno, 1994).

Ojo(1996) accepts that linkages between the formal and the informalfinancial sector exist in both side of the business, in mobilizationof saving as well as in the administration of credit. There areinstances where the informal groups save with the banks as groups andat time they apparently share the same client. Informal groups areeven urged to have a legitimate status that will issue them strongerfront to get credit from the formal sector (Bouman, 1995). It isundoubtedly informal credit markets are for the most partcorresponding to the formal market yet there is still an extensiveand unsatisfied interest for credit by informal and little borrowersmostly on the grounds that over passion of the formal financialsector and poor reconciliation between the formal and informalfinancial framework. Yet, the formal sector could make storeaccessible to the informal sector for onward lending to theentrepreneurs (Alieno, 1994).

Conclusions

Itis with no doubts that there exists financial gap for the smallbusinesses, which essentially need higher amounts of loans at lowerrates than informal operators can give yet they need legitimaterecord and security important to get to bank credits. On the otherhand, it is vital to incorporate informal financial organizations infinancial development procedures and to link them with the formalfinancial framework so as to expand investment funds activation andbuild their entrance to credit. The exclusion of the informalfinancial sector in the standard of the economy call for concern asit is evident that the informal sector speaks to an expansive segmentof the economy.

Thepowerless credit connection between the formal and the informalfinancial specialists recommend that couple of informal financialdelegates were effective in getting advance from the formal financialmediators to forward giving to borrowers in the informal financialbusiness sector. The result of this study concurs with the experiencereported by the studies on Sub Sahara Africa, by Aryeetey (1992),Hyuha (1993), Chipeta and Mkandawire (1992) and Aredo (1993)supported by the African Economic Research Consortium (AERC) whichtended to the issue of financial sector incorporation by researchingwhether there are connections between the formal, semi-formal, andinformal financial sectors. Despite the fact that most business bankswon`t have any desire to give trusts to the informal sector howevergovernment policy, for example, burden of credit roof and strict openbusiness sector operation will further diminish accessibility ofcredit to informal specialists or make the expense of obtaining highand out of compass of the informal sector operators (Osi- Afiana,2004).

Inspite of the fact that the neoclassical consistent contention thatonce the returns on assets in rural foundations are certain, thewhole financial sector would coordinate itself for funds to stream tothe most productive ventures, urban and rural (Lalesh, 2004).

Informalestablishments use particular methods to address the issues of data,exchange expenses and dangers in serving families and small scaleorganizations that keep banks from serving these business sectorsections in African nations (Osi- Afiana, 2004). However, the highrestriction of informal specialists and absence of access to formalfinance restrains the degree of financial intermediation by informaloperators. Subsequently it is vital both to incorporate informalestablishments in financial development techniques and to connectionthem all the more nearly with the formal financial framework keepingin mind the end goal to both expand mobilization of funds and makemore subsidizes accessible to exceptional yield interests in informalexercises.

Recommendations

Thepaper winds by providing way forward for the linkage so as to ensurethat there are more equitable linkages.

Theway that there are no credit connections between the formal andinformal financial sectors of the economy suggests that the informalsector depend just on the capital they can create in their businessfor development and extension. That is the reason they stay littleand basically irrelevant. The different governments ought toextension this hole by guaranteeing that informal financial businessadministrators are connection up with formal financial sectoradministrator so they can get to more credit. They can beadministration through the microfinance banks.

Thebanks ought to uproot the stringent conditions and unnecessarydocumentation that demoralize administrators in the informal sectorto look for bank advances. The business/Universal banks can utilizethe informal financial administration supplier to get bank loans andconnect with others who need credit to close the financial gapswithin the rural areas.

Thesemi-formal groups, for example, cooperative social groups androtational funds and credit group ought to attempt to develop theirhelpful finance exercises with the goal that they can pool assets andwork as a formal establishment however with close connections withthe informal groups. This will build the effort level of thesegroups. Albeit there is a solid linkage between the formal andinformal reserve funds foundations in most developing nations, moreexertion ought to be made to activate investment funds in the ruralterritories due to the need to channel fund into agrarian businessthat exist in that a piece of the country.

Differentmanifestations of formal non-bank financial delegates, for example,discount houses, renting organizations, finance organizations, and soon ought to be urged to work in the rural ranges giving differentstructures financial administrations alongside the microfinancefoundations to expand wellsprings of finance in the rural regions.

Itis imperative both to incorporate informal establishments infinancial development systems and to connection them all the morenearly with the formal financial framework so as to both expandinvestment funds activation and make more funds accessible toexceptional yield interests in informal exercises. A satisfactorymethodology ought to be placed set up to screen and record exercisesin the informal sector of the economy both financial and generally.The CBN and other significant body ought to guarantee that dependableinformation is deductively gathered to have a premise for policydetailing.

Positivemacroeconomic policy, particularly in the area of ideal authoritativesystem, access to credit and great economic environment ought to begained accessible for the ground of the informal sector. The thoughtis not to dispose of the informal groups in light of the fact thatthat is unrealistic however to help them connection up with theformal groups that have bigger funds particularly now after the bankmerging for on-loaning to micro entrepreneurs.

Theinformal financial delegates that mean to bear on re-loaning in theinformal financial business ought to be urged and appropriatelybundle to get to development finance advance which are given atconcessionary interest rate. The administration ought to make morecredit accessible to development banks and helpful banks since theyhave goal of entering and developing the little and informalorganizations in the nation.

ReferenceList

AjakaiyeO . and Akerele W.O (1996) &quotOverview of conceptual andmethodological issues in informal sector research&quot Conceptualand Methodological framework for informal sector research in Nigeria.CBN/NISER. 1996.

Anyanwu,C. M (2004) Microfinance Institutions in Nigeria: Policy, Practiceand Potentials Paper Presented at the G24 Workshop on &quotConstraintsto Growth in Sub Saharan Africa,&quot Pretoria, South Africa,November 29-30, 2004

Aredo,D. (1993), &quotThe Informal and Semi-Formal Financial Sectors inEthiopia: A study of the lqqubi lddir, and Savings and CreditCo-operatives. African Economic Research Consortium, Research Paper21. Nairobi: Kenya.

Aryeetey,E., (1992) &quotThe Relationship Between The Formal and InformalSectors of the Financial Market in Ghana&quot. AERC Research PaperNo. 10. Nairobi: Kenya, 1992.

Aryeetey,E. (1996a). &quotInformal financial markets in Africa &quot. In M.Matthew and G. Ngola, eds., Forging Links: Economic Research andPolicy Making in SubSaharan Africa. Paper presented at the 1995Senior Policy Seminar.

Aryeetey,E. (1996b). &quotRural finance in Africa : Institutionaldevelopments and access for the poor&quot. The World Bank AnnualConference on Development Economics, 25- 26 April, Washington, D.C.

Alieno,R. (1994). &quotFormal and Informal Institutions` lending policiesand access to credit by small scale enterprises in Kenya : Anempirical assessment. AERC Research Paper No. 111.

Bagachwa,M.D, (1995), Financial Integration and Development in Sub-SaharanAfrica: A Study of Informal Finance in Tanzania . OverseasDevelopment Institute, Working Paper 79.

Besley,T. (1994), &quotHow do market failures justify intervention in ruralcredit markets?&quot The World Bank Research Observer, val. 9, No.1: 27-47.

Bouman,F.J.A,(1995), Rotating and Accumulating Savings and CreditAssociations: A Development Perspective. World Development, 23(3):371-84.

Cameron,R., (1967), Banking in the Early Stages of Industrialization: A Studyin Comparative Economic History. New York: Oxford University Press.CBN annual report 2005

ChipetaC and Mkandawire M.l (1994) &quotLinkages between the informal andformal/semi-formal financial sectors in Malawi&quot African Journalof Economic Policy Vol.l No.1, Jan- June.

Damachi,U.G.( 1982), Self-help organisations: Guidelines and case studies fordevelopment planners and field workers (Bonn,Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Dual financial markets in Africa: Casestudies of linkages between informal and formal financialinstitutions (Saarbrucken/Fort Lauderdale, Verlag Breitenbach, 1987).

Goldsmith,R.W. (1955) &quotFinancial Structure and Economic Growth in AdvancedCountries.&quot In M. Abramovitz (ed.) Capital Formation andEconomic Growth, Princeton, NJ : Princeton university Press.

Hoff,K &amp J. E. Stiglitz (1990), &quotImperfect Information and RuralCredit Markets- Puzzles and policy Perspectives&quot The World BankEconomic Review, Vol. 4, No. 3 Sept.

LaleshN (2004) &quotA Theoretical Review of the Urban Informal Sector orInformal Economy in Developing Countries and Its Future Directions inan Era of Globalisation&quot Department of Humanities {Geography),Western Sydney Institute of TAFENepean College, Sydney, Australia

LevitskyJ. (2001) &quotInnovations in the financing of Small andMicroenterprises in Developing countries&quot International LabourOrganisation, Small Enterprise Development Working Paper- SED 22/E

NissankeM. and E. Aryeetey. (1998). Financial integration and development insub- Saharan Africa. Routledge: London and New York.

OjoJ.A.T (1996) Informal financial institution: Nature, Characteristicsand operations&quot Conceptual and Methodological framework forinformal sector research in Nigeria. CBN/NISER.

Okurut,F. N &amp B, Thuto (2006), &quotInformal Financial market inBotswana: A case study of Gaborne City. Botswana Institute forDevelopment Study (BIDAP), Discussion Paper.

OresotuF.O (1996) &quotLinkages between Macroeconomics Policy Environmentand the Informal Sector&quot Conceptual and Methodological frameworkfor informal sector research in Nigeria. CBN/NISER. 1996. .1

Osi-Afiana, L.(2004), Informal Sector is High Pfiority.Businessdayonline. Published October 18th

Parhusip,U. (1989) Linking formal and informal financial institutions, Paperpresented at a Seminar on Informal Financial Markets (Washington, DC,World Bank, 1989).

Shaw,E. (1973), Financial Deepening in Economic Development, New York:Oxford University Press.

Stiglitz,J. and A. Weiss, (1981), &quotCredit Rationing in Markets withImperfect Information.&quot American Economic Review. 71.

Thillairajah,S., Development of Rural Financial Markets in SSA. Discussion PaperNo. 219, World Bank, African Technical Department Series, 1996.

Timberg,T. A &amp . C.V, Ailyar, (1984), Informal Credit Markets in India.Economic Development and Cultural Change: 43-59.